Member
Member
macalter   2008-07-16, 02:38
#1

I can't do the HTML codes again within the image descriptions. They fail to "translate", for example italics

Member
Member
Connie   2008-07-16, 07:43
#2

yes, that I noticed as well, text in bold, which was used also for image-title and image-alt as well was not translated in image-alt and image-title

Administrator
Administrator
acrylian   2008-07-16, 08:35
#3

I just tried it with the latest svn. HTML is still possible within the album/image descriptions and the custom fields. It is not within any other field (and never was..:-)).

Member
Member
macalter   2008-07-16, 12:52
#4

No, I'm using code within image description only. And I see the HTML tags, not the output.

Member
Member
sbillard   2008-07-16, 16:14
#5

Looks like an over zelous HTML validation issue purge assuming it is the Effervescence+ theme. That will be fixed. If it is a different theme, please let us know which.

Member
Member
macalter   2008-07-17, 00:22
#6

I'm using the Default theme. Had the problem once before and something was fixed to make it all better (nightly build). Not sure if current problem is related.

Member
Member
sbillard   2008-07-17, 04:11
#7

Well, see if the nightly fixes it. If not we will have to do some more research.

Member
Member
macalter   2008-07-17, 23:03
#8

svn 1.1.7 #1967: no change, still see the however I can never tell if you mean "nightly" for my time zone

Member
Member
sbillard   2008-07-17, 23:34
#9

Well, it is working for me on [1967]. Just to be sure we are talking the same thing:

default theme, index.php where it does a printImageDesc() below the image.

But I did use [i][/i] which is the [i]correct[/i] html.

Member
Member
sbillard   2008-07-18, 03:43
#10

Nightlies are defined in terms of when they are created--2300 Pacific time. That will normally be [b]after[/b] the time of my post.

Administrator
Administrator
acrylian   2008-07-18, 09:22
#11

It's working for me, too. `is also correct html, but it's recommend to use[i][/i]` indeed (the first is only visual, the other considered to be sematic...:-))

  
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group.
Made with by Curves UI.